Meeting Summary for Pennsylvania Constitution Plus 50 More!
Nov 04, 2024 06:59 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) ID: 833 7791 8112
Quick recap
Joe discussed the original 1913 U.S. tax law and its interpretation, emphasizing the importance of understanding the meaning of terms like 'United States' and 'State' in the context of the law. He also highlighted the concept of constitutional rights, the trust relationship between the grantor, trustee, and beneficiary in the context of the United States Constitution, and the implications of the term 'commerce'. Joe stressed the need for the People to learn and assert their inherent rights as the State Constitutions suggest, particularly in relation to the Pennsylvania Declaration of Rights and the US Constitution. He also discussed the importance of due process in the legal system, the role of the constitution in protecting individual rights, and the right to alter, reform, and abolish the government as necessary.
Next steps
All attendees to study their state constitutions and understand their rights as outlined in the Declaration/Bill of Rights.
All attendees to research and understand the difference between constitutional rights and statutory privileges.
All attendees to review the original 1913 Tariff Act and its implications on federal income tax.
All attendees to learn about the concept of status, standing, and jurisdiction in legal matters.
All attendees to study the Articles of Confederation and understand how it relates to the unity of the 50 states.
All attendees to practice sending notices and sworn affidavits to public servants when challenging government actions.
Joe to send the recording of the meeting to attendees who joined late.
Summary
Interpreting 'United States' and 'State Joe discussed the original 1913 Unted States tax law, focusing on the interpretation of the terms 'United States' and 'State'. He highlighted that the law was not intended for all Americans, but rather for those residing in the 10 mile square of the District of Columbia and its possessions. Joe emphasized the importance of understanding the meaning of these terms in the context of the law, as they determine who is subject to taxation. He also pointed out inconsistencies in the law, where the terms 'United States' and 'State' are used interchangeably, potentially leading to confusion. Understanding Constitutional Rights and Tax Law Joe discussed the concept of constitutional rights and the importance of understanding the original laws that govern the Federal income tax. He explained that the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land, but only over the 18 enumerated powers granted to it. He emphasized that the people are the sovereigns, and the States are sovereign to the United States. Joe also highlighted the trust relationship between the grantor (the people), the trustee (public servants), and the beneficiary (the people) in the context of the United States Constitution. He suggested that the Federal income tax is unlawful and unconstitutional, and that it could be challenged by questioning the 1913 Tariff Act and the definitions of 'State' and 'United States' and U.S.C. Title 26 status in the law. Joe discussed the concept of commerce and its implications in various aspects of life. He explained how the term 'commerce' is used to move people often through a court suystem via unlawful acts, and how statutorily created terms like abortion (womb murder) and child support (obligor) are used in place of a status as one of the People. He also highlighted how the term 'motor vehicle' is attached to an automobile, making every day activities subject to various charges and regulations. Joe used the US Code (USC Title 18) to illustrate how the term'motor vehicle' is defined as any carriage or contravance propelled by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes, which has replaced the historical definition of an automobile. He emphasized that this statutory definition is used to bind people into commercial chargeable acts, such as considering going to the grocery store or work, a form of commerce, and to bind them unlawfully by changing the terms of what we think the definitions mean. Joe discussed the importance of understanding the laws and state constitutions to reclaim the country's original status as a great constitutional Republic. He emphasized the need for the People to learn and teach others about the constitution, rather than relying on high-powered attorneys and iconic public figures, presidents and public servants. Joe also highlighted the significance of the Articles of Confederation, which united the 13 colonies and later the 50 states, and the importance of understanding the rights and privileges granted by each state's constitution. He stressed the need for the People to learn about the maxims of law and to use the state constitutions to express their rights. Asserting Inherent Rights and Privileges Joe discussed the importance of understanding and asserting one's inherent rights as one of the People, particularly in relation to the Pennsylvania Declaration of Rights and the US Constitution. He emphasized the distinction between inherent rights and statutory privileges, and the need to stand on one's rights rather than accepting privileges controlled by the government. Joe also highlighted the importance of understanding the concept of trial by jury and the right to bear arms, as these are not privileges but rights granted by the Constitution. He further pointed out that the State Constitution is higher seated than the US Constitution, and therefore, rights granted by the State Constitution should be prioritized. Lastly, Joe mentioned the right to prosecute and defend a civil or criminal case without an attorney, as this is a constitutional right. Supreme Law and Asserting Constitutional Rights Joe discussed the concept of the "supreme law of the land" and its limitations, emphasizing that it only applies to the powers granted to the United States Constitution. He cited examples from Arizona and Arkansas state constitutions to illustrate this point. Joe also stressed the importance of citizens asserting their constitutional rights and sending notices and sworn affidavits to public servants. He encouraged the group to become their own law lovers and how to file specific documents to protect their rights. Joe also highlighted the significance of attorneys not swearing under penalty of perjury and the potential for abuse in the legal system. California's Constitution and Rights Joe expressed his enthusiasm for the topic and his desire to educate others. He discussed his experience with California's constitution, which he found confusing and misleading on Ballotpedia. He emphasized that California is part of the 50-state union and therefore has rights granted and reserved outside of the U.S. Constitution. Joe also mentioned a recent Supreme Court case in California that reaffirmed the right to bear arms. He planned to record the meeting for those who arrived late, as they missed important information about the Federal income tax. Due Process and Constitutional Rights Joe discussed the importance of judicial (not substantive etc.) due process in the legal system, emphasizing the need for a trial by jury and an impartial judge. He also highlighted the right to just compensation when property is taken for public use. Joe then moved on to discuss the role of the constitution in protecting individual rights, using examples from different states such as Kentucky, North Dakota, and Oklahoma. He stressed that the state constitution is the supreme law of the land and that its provisions are mandatory unless otherwise stated. Understanding the Constitution and Rights Joe discussed the importance of understanding the Constitutions and the rights of the people. He emphasized that all political power is inherent in the people and that governments are instituted for their protection, security, and benefit. He also highlighted the right to alter, reform, and abolish the government as necessary. Joe pointed out that the Federal Income Tax has been unlawfully dealt with for generations and that big changes are coming. He also discussed the concept of ex post facto laws and the right to create private contracts. Joe concluded by stating that the United States is a union of 50 plus one, with 50 plus one constitutions that can be used to stand on rights and fight against bad government. He encouraged everyone to review the critical information from the beginning of the meeting and to reach out with any questions. Link below!
Comments